J
!
VI MANA
1
HONG KONG AS SUISEQUENTLY AMENDED DURING DISCUSSIONS IN HONG KONG -
COPY OF FULL TEXT OF SPEAKING NOTE TO HKD BY PAG, IN SUMMARY FAKING
THE FOLLOWING POINTS:
(A) DEVELOPMENTS IN REPRESENTATIVE GOVERNMENT WERE NOT ISOLATED EVENT
S,
BUT PART OF A LONGER PROCESS. EVOLUTION OF THE SYSTEM OF
GOVERNMENT REFLECTED THE GROWING NEEDS OF AN INCREASINGLY COMPLEX
AND SOPHISTICATED SOCIETY.
(B) THERE WAS A LONG TRADITION OF CONSULTATION IN HONG KONG.
(C) I IDENTIFIED DEVELOPMENTS WHICH HAD TAKEN PLACE SINCE THE
LATE 1960S.
(D) THE 1984 WHITE PAPER HAD RECOGNISED THE NEED TO ENSURE THAT
PROSPERITY AND STABILITY WERE NOT PUT AT RISK THROUGH THE INTRODUCTIO
N
OF TOO MANY CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGES TO0 RAPIDLY.
(E) THE NEW LEGCO WAS MODERATE. THIS SHOULD REASSURE THE CHINESE.
(F) MINISTERS HAD PERSONALLY MADE CLEAR AT A HIGH LEVEL THEIR
AWARENESS OF THE NEED FOR PRUDENCE IN CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT.
WE WERE DETERMINED TO AVOID PREJUDICING STABILITY AND PROSPERITY.
A VIGOROUS PUBLIC DEBATE IN HONG KONG WAS NATURAL AND INEVITABLE:
THIS REFLECTED A VIGOROUS ECONOMIC SOCIETY. THIS SHOULD NOT BE A
MATTER OF CONCERN TO THE CHINESE. I STRESSED THAT NO DECISIONS
HAD YET BEEN TAKEN OR PRE-CONCEIVED IDEAS EXISTED ABOUT THE 1987
REVIEW AND THAT HMG HAD NO INTENTION OF ATTEMPTING TO IMPOSE ON
HONG KONG BEFORE A REPLICA OF THE BRITISH POLITICAL SYSTEM.
8. I THEN MADE THE TWO POINTS IN PARAGRAPH 2 OF YOUR TELNO 1814
TO HONG KONG, IE:
(A) WE WERE DETERMINED TO ADMINISTER HONG KONG WELL FOR THE NEXT
12 YEARS AND BE SEEN TO DO SO: WE HAD NOT AT PRESENT IDENTIFIED
ISSUES CALLING FOR CONSULTATION AND SOLUTION BY BOTH SIDES.
(B) OUR PROPOSAL FOR AN INFORMAL DIALOGUE OUTSIDE THE JLG.
I CONCLUDED BY EMPHASISING THE SENSITIVITY OF THE ISSUE: BOTH SIDES
MUST PROCEED CAREFULLY. I SOUGHT A REACTION TO THE IDEAS I HAD PUT
FORWARD YESTERDAY (PEKING TELNO 1726).
VETO
I
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.