TNAG-1349-FCO40-1790-Chinese-visa-office-in-Hong-Kong-1984 — Page 130

4. As I mentioned to your

in the telephone, I have a couple of points on the draft Ordinance

in Hong Kong Telmo 1340 of 16 May. First, in

paragraph there

are

9

of

по

the Schedule, I assume that sub-paragraphs which have

insertion of "(1)"

been omitted, but the

after the numeral "9" might suggest otherwise.

in paragraph 9

Second, in items (B) and (F) of the Schedule, I think that we should specify what "paragraph 3" we are talking about, Le. Whether it is in the Ordinance itself, the

of

a

Schedule,

sub-paragraph of paragraph 9 Third, and most important, we need to be sure whether item (A) of paragraph 9 is inconsistent with paragraph 10. I think that this latter point is one on which Hong Kong should be asked to comment.

5/6/84

C.A. Whomersley Legal Advisers