TNAG-1274-FCO40-1624-Vietnamese-refugees-in-Hong-Kong-1983 — Page 187

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

CONFIDENTIAL

safety zones for refugees or in their obtaining

assurances from the governments involved that refugee

camps would be safeguarded from attack. We were

particularly concerned about attacks earlier this year

on refugee camps along the Thai/Cambodian border and

about threats to camps holding Zimbabwean refugees in

Botswana.

Asylum Seekers in Distress at Sea

2. Document EC 'SCP/30, which will be considered by

the Sub-Committee on Protection, has not been received

by the Department at the time of briefing.

HMG declined

to participate in a new UNHCR scheme for rescues at sea

resettlement offers (RASRO) earlier this year. Our

ase

reasons were that we continuour commitment as a

flag state to accept Vietnamese refugees rescued by UK

with registered shipping who cannot be resettled by UNHCR fin

90 days. We also accept close family reunion cases.

We are unable to offer an increase in Vietnamese

refugee admissions or to accept la

automatic guarantees for refugee entry beyond our

present commitments. We were concerned that the

system of

unquantifiable guarantees under RASRO would add to

the pull factor and may cause new outflows of refugees.

Both we and Hong Kong were doubtful that UNHCR could

meet assurances about the timely removal of boat-rescue

cases under the scheme or that resettlement opportunities

for the hard core of other refugees (who constitute 40%

CONFIDENTIAL

/of cases

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.