9 -
responsibility. This was deliberate, because no government
can protect the public completely against malfeasance and poor
management.
16.
And so we come to the 1981 amendments to the Banking
and Deposit-taking Companies Ordinances. Those of you who
have followed the very well documented debate on the subject
closely enough will remember that it was in recognition of
the Government's responsibilities for the financial sector as a
whole and of the monetary policy considerations I have mentioned
that the three-tier system was introduced in 1981. I do not think
it is necessary for me to go into this in any detail today, even
if I had the time to do so, but I recommend those who wish to
understand the thinking at the time to read the speeches which
the then Financial Secretary made on this subject in the Legislative
Council on 29th April 1981.
17.
It is of course unfortunate that this phase of the
restructuring exercise should coincide with a slow down in
economic activity generally and sharp downward adjustments
in property and land prices in particular, which have been major
possible
reasons other than malfeasance leading to the failure of a few
registered deposit -taking companies, but this could not have been
foreseen in April 1981. The requirement under the three-tier
structure for deposit-taking companies to run down all short-
term deposits by June this year may well have contributed to
these problems, but I am not convinced this was the critical
factor. I am, however, certain that had nothing been done to
stop the erosion of bank deposits the resulting 'cut throat'
caused much greater
competition for deposits would have
/damage...
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.