CHEN THEN ARGUES THẬT, THE PROPOSALSĮ
APPLICABLE TO HONG KONG BECAUSE:
HURRITO
(A) BOTH ARE CHINESE TERRITORY AND, ALTHOUGH THEY PRACTISE POLITICAL, SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC SYSTEMS DIFFERENT TO THE MAINLAND, BOTH MUST REVERT TO THE MOTHERLAND:
H
(B) COMIYA'S SOVEREIGNTY OVER BOTH HONG KONG AND TAIWAN BROOKS NO OUTSIDE INTERFERENCE!
(C) IN BOTH CASES STORICAL AND ACTUAL CONDITIONS WILL DELTAKEN CINTO ACCOUNT (ALONG WITH THE WISHES OF CHINA AND THE PEOPLE IN
TAIWAN AND HONG KONG.
(D) THE SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGIONS PROVIDED FOR IN ARTICLE 31 OFFER A SOUND LEGAL BASIS FOR A SPECIAL SETTLEMENT OF THE HONG KONG AND TAIWAN ISSUES.
COMMENT
E/SO
4. WE HAVE NOT SEEN THE APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 31 TO BOTH TAIWAN AND HONG KONG SPELT OUT QUITE SO EXPLICITLY BEFORE. WE SHOULD BE INTERESTED TO KNOW WHETHER CHEN'S THESIS HAS BEEN FOLLOWED UP IN OTHER CHINESE PERIODICALS, AND WHETHER THERE HAS BEEN ANYIO COMMENTARY ON IT.
OFFICIAL
5. COPIES OF THE WEN WEI PO ARTICLE FOLLOW BY BAG. IN THE MEANTIME, I SHOULD DE GRATEFUL FOR YOUR VIEWS ON THE STANDING OF THE PERIODICAL ZHONGGUO FAZHI BAO''.
# 1
SIGNED. P.1. WEBB
NANN
j
14
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.