3
a
cannot be maintained.
The leaders of China keep on ressuring
us that after 1997 Hong Kong will continue to operate under
the present capitalist system and the same legal system.
But we understand that there is no independence of the
judiciary in China. How then can we be sure that the judiciary
in Hong Kong will not be interfered with under the proposed
Without an independent judiciary, there can
administration?
be no guarantee that the people of Hong Kong will continue
to enjoy the many freedoms which form the pillars of our
society.
Whilst much emphasis has been laid by both Government
on the importance of prosperity, we believe that these freedoms
are of equal, if not, greater importance as they are cherished
by everyone, whether rich or poor.
6.
We appreciate that it takes time to agree on a solution
acceptable to China, Great Britain and the people of Hong Kong,
but time is fast running out, for if the situation were to be
allowed to continue, we doubt if there will be any stability,
let alone prosperity, left to be preserved. To achieve the
declared common aim, we believe that prolonged entanglement
between the two governments over the issue of sovereignty
will be counter-productive.
As a first step, the 1997 deadline
must be eradicated. China and Britain should discuss and agree
on
a realistic and reasonable transitional period acceptable
to both countries and the people of Hong Kong. During the
transitional period, both countries must continue to co-operate
fully with each other and take appropriate practical steps
to demonstrate their sincerety in their prusuit of the common
aim of preserving Hong Kong's stability and prosperity.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.