TNAG-1216-FCO40-1519-Extradition-treaties-between-Hong-Kong-and-other-countries-1982 — Page 137

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

GR 703

CONFIDENTIAL

CONFIDENTIAL

DESKBY FCO 23293BZ

DESKEY LISBON 231000Z

FM HONG KONG 230965Z DEC 82

TO IMMEDIATE F C O

TELEGRAM NUMBER 1509 OF 23 DECEMBER

INFO IMMEDIATE LISBON

YOUR TELNO 1095 : EXTRADITION OF FUGITIVES TO MACAU

1. I CAN DELAY SIGNATURE FOR A LITTLE WHILE BUT WOULD NOT WISH TO

DO SO FOR LONG. UNDER SECTION 12 OF THE EXTRADITION ACT 1970

APPLICATION FOR THE RELEASE OF THE MEN CAN BE MADE IF THEY HAVE

NOT BEEN SURRENDERED WITHIN TWO MONTHS OF THE DATE OF THE

MAGISTRATE'S COMMITAL ORDER. IN THIS CASE THE ORDER WAS MADE

ON 13 OCTOBER. WE ARE THEREFORE VULNERABLE TO AN APPLICATION FOR

RELEASE AT ANY TIME.

2. CONSULAR PROTECTION. AS INDICATED IN PARA G OF MY TELNO

1496, ARRESTS OF HONG KONG BELONGERS IN MACAU ARE SOMETIMES

NOTIFIED TO US INFORMALLY THROUGH IMMIGRATION AND/OR POLICE

CHANNELS BUT THIS HAD NOT BEEN DONE SYSTEMATICALLY. THE

CONSUL-GENERAL IN MACAU (1.E. THE SENIOR BRITISH TRADE COMMISSIONER

HERE) HAS NO RESIDENT STAFF IN MACAU AND HAS NOT HAD A ROLE

IN THIS AREA. WE WILL REVIEW THESE ARRANGEMENTS WITH HIM, BUT

SINCE THE MEN HAD PROPER LEGAL REPRESENTATION FOLLOWING THEIR

ORIGINAL ARREST IN MACAU (PARA 7 OF MY TUR) IT IS DIFFICULT TO

SEE WHAT DIFFERENCE PROTECTION IN MACAU COULD HAVE MADE TO

THE OUTCOME OF THE PROCEEDINGS THERE. IT IS NOT CLEAR TO US

WHAT, IF ANY, OBLIGATIONS THE PORTUGUEST GOVERNMENT MAY HAVE HAD

UNDER THE VIENNA CONVENTION ON CONSULAR RELATIONS TO NOTIFY THE

EMBASSY IN LISBON OF THE SUPREME COURT HEARING OR THE EARLIER

PROCEEDINGS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL. ARTICLE 36 DOES NOT SEEM

RELEVANT TO THE SUPREME COURT HEARING SINCE THE MEN WERE THEN

AT LIBERTY IN HONG KONG.

3. A MORE SERIOUS POINT IS THE CONTENTION THAT THE MEN WERE NOT

INFORMED OF THE APPEAL TO THE SUPREME COURT, AND THAT THE LAWYER

APPOINTED TO REPRESENT THEM IN PORTUGAL NEITHER CONTESTED THE

APPEAL IN THE SUPREME COURT NOR APPEARED IN COURT. IT WOULD CERTAINLY

BE HELPFUL IF THE EMBASSY IN LISBON COULD MAKE FURTHER URGENT

ENQUIRIES ON THESE POINTS. THE SUPREME COURT DELIVERED ITS

JUDGEMENT IN THIS CASE ON 7 JANUARY 1981. THE NAMES OF THE FIVE

NOW IN CUSTODY ARE CHAO POU FAI, LEUNG TU KEI, VONG CHAU KOK,

IP WENG HENG AND CHEANG TAI HENG (THERE WERE FOUR OTHER

DEFENDENTS WITH THOM WE ARE NOT PRESENTLY CONCERNED). THE DEFENCE

CONFIDENTIAL

/

LAWYER

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.