TNAG-1205-FCO40-1507-Policy-on-visas-and-entry-certificates-in-Hong-Kong-1982 — Page 115

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

4.

1 EXPLAINED TO MARE ON 11 JUNE THAT IF THE PARTY INTENDED TO LEAVE ON 15 JUNE IT WOULD BE QUITE IMPOSSIBLE FOR US TO ARRANCE

ANYTHING BEFORE THEN. HE ACCEPTED THIS BUT WONDERED IF IT WON BE POSSIBLE FOR HONG KONG IMMIGRATION TO ISSUE VISAS TO THE

12 CISKETANS ON ARRIVAL ON 24 JUNE. I SAID THAT I COULD NOT

ANSWER THIS QUESTION. THE FCO FIRST HAD TO DECIDE ON ITS ATTITUDE TO CITIZENS OF THE CISKEI AND THEN THE HONG KONG

GOVERNMENT WOULD HAVE TO CONSIDER WHETHER IT WAS PREPARED TO

IF FACILITATE THE ENTRY OF THE 12 CISKETANS AS HE PROPOSED. THEY WISHED, SOUTH AFRICA HOUSE COULD APPROACH SAFD IN LONDON TO ARGUE THEIR CASE. IT IS LIKELY THEREFORE THAT YOU WILL BE

CONTACTED ON THIS POINT.

5.

IF IT IS POSSIBLF IT WOULD BE HELPFUL IF YOU AND/OR HONG KONG

COULD GIVE AN INDICATION OF THE LIKELIHOOD OF MARE'S REQUEST

(SENTENCE 2 PARA 4) SUCCEEDING. IF THERE IS NO POSSIBILITY OF HONG KONG ACTING AS PROPOSED WE OUGHT TO SAY SO BEFORE THE PARTY

LEAVE FOR TAIPEI ON 15 JUNE.

FCO PASS ALL EXCEPT CAPE TOWN.

EVANS

NNNN

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.