Q.9 IS THERE NOT A SPECIAL TREATMENT FOR INFORMING OBJECTORS?
A.9 OBJECTORS ARE INFORMED OF DECISIONS BY LETTER.
Q.10 WILL THE GOVERNMENT NOW STATE THE REASONS FOR NOT UP-HOLDING
HER APPEAL ?
A.10 IT IS NOT OUR PRACTICE TO DISCUSS INDIVIDUAL CASES.
Q.11 DID THE GOVERNOR-IN-COUNCIL TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE NUMEROUS
REPRESENTATIONS MADE ON HER BEHALF?
A.11 ALL FACTORS IN ALL CASES ARE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT.
Q.12 WILL ALL THOSE WHO MADE REPRESENTATIONS ON HER BEHALF RECEIVE
DIRECT REPLIES?
A.12 IT IS GOVERNMENT PRACTICE, TO ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF ALL REPRESENTATIONS MADE TO IT.
Q.13 IF SHE OVERSTAYS, ARE THERE ANY CHANNELS OF APPEAL OPEN TO MS. VERTUCCI?
A.13 ANY PERSON WHO OVERSTAYS MAY BE THE SUBJECT OF A REMOVAL
ORDER AGAINST WHICH AN APPEAL MAY BE MADE UNDER SECTION 53A OF
THE IMMIGRATION ORDINANCE.
Q.14 HOW LONG COULD THIS PROCESS LAST IF MS. VERTUCCI WERE TO
TAKE ADVANTAGE OF IT?
A.14 THAT IS A HYPOTHETICAL QUESTION.
Q.15 WOULD SHE BE SUCCESSFUL IN SUCH AN APPEAL?
A.15 THAT IS A HYPOTHETICAL QUESTION.
Q.16 WHERE WILL MS. VERTUCCI BE DEPORTED?
A.16 THAT IS A HYPOTHETICAL QUESTION.
PERSONS LEAVING BEFORE THEIR EXTENSIONS OF STAY FINALLY EXPIRE,
GO TO A DESTINATION OF THEIR OWN CHOICE.
Q.17 WHERE WILL SHE BE REMOVED TO, IF SHE OVERSTAYS?
A. 17 THAT IS A HYPOTHETICAL QUESTION.
(IF PRESSED: PEOPLE ARE REMOVED NORMALLY TO COUNTRIES OF WHICH THEY ARE CITIZENS OR NORMALLY RESIDENT).
Q.18 WHO WILL MEET THE COST OF REMOVAL. A. 18 THAT IS A HYPOTHETICAL QUESTION.
WHENEVER POSSIBLE, PERSONS ARE REMOVED AT THEIR OWN EXPENSE.
Q.19 IS THE GOVERNMENT'S CONSIDERATION OF APPEALS BY PERSONS SUCH AS MS. VERTUCCI NOT A TOKEN EXERCISE AS THEY CANNOT BE EXPECTED TO PUT THEIR CASE SATISFACTORILY WITHOUT KNOWING THE REASONS FOR IMMIGRATION DEPARTMENT'S DECISION?
A.19 NO.
2 CONFIDENTIAL
/a.20
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.