1
CONFIDENTIAL
4. I HAVE JUST SEEN A COPY OF MR RAISON'S REPLY OF 10 SEPTEMBER
TO LORD BELSTEAD ON THE SUBJECT OF MULTIPLE VISIT ENTRY
CERTIFICATES AND HIS OFFER TO AGREE TO SOME EXTENSION OF THE
TIME LIMIT ON THE TWO CATEGORIES IF IT WOULD HELP IN OTHER
CONTEXTO, E G THE NATIONALITY DESCRIPTION IN PASSPORTS.
5. I FEEL BOUND TO SAT THAT UNOFFICIALS FEEL STRONGLY THAT THERE
IS SOUND ARGUMENT IN LOGIC AND IN LAW FOR THE PASSPORTS OF BDTCS
TO SHOW THEIR NATIONAL STATUS AS BRITISH. THEY ALSO CONSIDER
THAT THEIR REQUEST FOR MULTIPLE VISIT ENTRY CERTIFICATES
FOR A LONGER PERIOD THAN IS CURRENTLY THE CASE IS REASONABLE IN
ITSELF. I WOULD ADVISE STRONGLY, THEREFORE, AGAINST ANY ATTEMPT
TO LINK A DECISION ON THESE TWO ISSUES.
YOUDE
THIS TELEGRAM WAS NOT ADVANCED
LIMITED
NTD
HK v G D
PS/MR RIFKIND PS | LORD BELSTEAD CHIEF CLERK MA GIFFARD hoRD N.G. LENNOX
MR DONALD
HONG KONG GOVT Office
LONDON
2
CONFIDENTIAL
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.