by popular and respected local figures; there was no radical left wing involvement in the organisation. The issue was one over which all Chinese, regardless of political allegiance, could unite; this in itself was an attraction.
Thus many people, who would have remained quiescent on other issues, were openly sympathetic to the protest. Indeed, the issue inspired an unprecedented degree of emotion, particularly amongst young people. This, together with the effective publicity for the rally, produced a large and impressive demonstration which outstripped previous "united China" issues (e.g. the Senkaku Islands) in scale and popularity. The organisational ability of the leading participants was equally impressive and is of significance for future demonstrations, The possibility of "united China" issues such as this recurring cannot be predicted but should not be dismissed. However, it seems unlikely in present circumstances that the same degree of popular protest could be organised and mobilised against the Government; particularly as the present policy which the FTU is required to follow is not to participate in activities which may adversely affect the stability of Hong Kong. A greater likelihood is that other less circumspect pressure groups may seek to exploit issues such as increases in cost of transport and accommodation.
11
..
memorandum.
Members are invited to note the contents of this
22 December 1982 (SCR 3/3371/82)
CONFIDENTIAL
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.