TNAG-1117-FCO40-1391-Future-of-the-Dependent-Territories-1982 — Page 144

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

BACKGROUND

1.

There appears to be no recent authoritative opinion or

policy on the usage of the term 'The British Empire'.

11.

It was

raised in the House of Commons on 2 May 1949 when, in reply to

a PQ, Mr Attlee said 'Terminology, if it is to be useful, keeps

step with developments without becoming rigid or doctrinaire.

All constitutional developments in the Commonwealth, the British

Commonwealth or the British Empire I use the three terms

deliberately - have been the subject of consultation between

His Majesty's Government, and there has been no agreement to

adopt or exclude the use of any one of these terms, nor any

decision on the part of His Majesty's Government in the United

Kingdom to do so

Opinions differ in different parts

of the British Empire and Commonwealth on this matter and I think

it better to allow people to use the expression they like best.

Use of the term 'British Commonwealth' or 'Commonwealth' had been

earlier discussed at the Commonwealth Prime Ministers' Meeting

in April 1949; delegates were unable to agree. The United Kingdom

proposed that either be used as might suit best.

2.

It was in 1949 that the term 'British Empire' began to

disappear, when it was agreed that India could continue to be a

member of the Commonwealth after becoming a republic.

3.

In his book 'Commonwealth and Colonial Law' (1966)

Sir Kenneth Roberts-Wray examined the statutory definitions of the

expression 'British Empire': 'Although the expression was in

general use until a few years ago, the definitions differ not

/only

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.