regard to further discovery of documents which it was alleged were
It is Mr Blaker's in the possession, custody or control of Mr Blaker. solicitors' intention to resist any such further discovery on the ground that the documents have never been in their client's possession etc.
Notwithstanding that the Legal Department in Hong Kong feel that there
I think may be no need to claim immunity for any document in this case, that you will wish to consider, from an FCO viewpoint, the general basis upon which such a claim might have to be made.
I shall be happy to discuss this with you, and I am copying this letter to Mallinson in the Attorney General's Chambers.
Mal:
черев
John Baila
Бале
J B BAILEY
3
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.