TNAG-1101-FCO40-1351-Legislation-on-homosexuality-in-Hong-Kong-including--Report--1981 — Page 381

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

392

MRS. ELLIOTT'S LETTER TO MR. J. M. DUFFY

Appx 40

錫思

MRS.) E. ELLIOTT.

TEL. 0-42414

OUR

REPI

YOUH REM

55. Kung Lok Road, Kwun Tong. KOWLOON.

24th March, 1980.

Mr. J.M. Duffy,

Legal Department,

Government Offices,

Lower Albert Road,

Hong Kong.

Dear Mr. Duffy,

I should be glad if you would clarify a matter that has been

plaguing me in the MacLennan case.

You will remember that you told me about the charges against

MacLennan, and said that you personally had taken the statements from the 8

witnesses. However, from the inquest, it would seem that this was not the case,

but that police interviewed the witnesses and passed on the file to you. From

the police evidence you decided to prosecute. This latter way, I believe, would

be standard procedure.

-

When you said you interviewed the witnesses, I believed you had got the truth as far as one can know the truth from witnesses who were

obviously triad members. If the reports came from the police therefore, I

would discard them in the light of the fact that I knew that Brooks and Quinn

were trying to "set up" MacLennan, and they have used triad witnesses in other

cases. I should have thought their job was to arrest triad members, not use them

as witnesses against law-abiding citizens.

Your clarification in this point would be appreciated.

These eight charges have been quoted as a motive for MacLennan's

alleged suicide. However Mr. Pelly demolished that motive when he explained that

Mr. MacLennan did not know about the eight charges and thought the SIU were

still referring to the 1978 affair.

Cont./........

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.