333
In ition to reading the statements and examining photographs, I have had the
opportunity to examine the shirt and pullover worn by the deceased, John MacLennan.
In considering the type of weapon used, I agree with the analysis of P S PRESCOTT
that any form of accidental event can be ruled out. In my examination of the
statements and photographs, I adopted the approach of attempting to find any
ballistic or 'medico' ballistic which would exclude either option, namely that
the shots were fired by the deceased or another person.
MEDICAL
of
There is ample medical opinion, in the form statements expressed and quoted
instances, to show that even the most severe wound (Shot No 1 in the Post Mortem
Report by Dr WONG) would not necessarily have caused immediate death or incapacitation.
(Incapacitation being an inability to continue an intended activity). Dr ONG
offers 3 to 5 minutes during which 'life' was possible after receipt of a wound
comparable to Shot No 1, Dr GIBSON 2 minutes, Professor JOHNSTON 2 minutes and Dr
WONG in transcript statement, up to 10 or 20 minutes.
weapon used, I estimate that 2 or 3 seconds would be the fastest time that 5 shots
could be discharged and, therefore, that with at least one minute's consciousness
being medically available, it is feasible that the injuries were self inflicted.
Indeed, from a time aspect alone, it would be possible for the cylinder to be emptied
and all six shots fired.
From my knowledge of the type
From my knowledge of research and design, I know that it is relatively easy to
deliver a bullet wound which will inevitably end in death and, conversely, that
it is relatively difficult to cause a wound which will give immediate or
nearly immediate death or incapacitation.
Shots to the chest are less likely
to have an immediate disabling effect than, for example, shots to the head. As
the chest is not the most effective site, I am sure that sufficient time could have been
available for the wounds to be deliberately inflicted by the deceased, irrespective
of the order in which they were fired.
BALLISTIC
I am satisfied that the two experts who had the opprotunity to match bullets
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.