TNAG-1101-FCO40-1351-Legislation-on-homosexuality-in-Hong-Kong-including--Report--1981 — Page 300

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

311

7 -

iii)

iv)

Whether MacLennan's prosecution for alleged homo-

sexuality was or was not, in fact, just, it is

clear that on the 14th January 1980 he was suddenly

made aware by Supt Trotman that the question of his

prosecution for homosexual offences which, according

to Supt Pelly, "he had assumed was in the past" was

in the process of being re-activated by the S I U.

It does not seem to me to matter a great deal whether

he knew the details i e that all 8 counts were to be

used against him or only a lesser number. He must

have known that, guilty or not, a great deal of

unpleasantness was to follow and there was some chance

that he might be convicted and imprisoned.

He may

have stated that he wanted to go to court and face the

charges in 1978 but did he really? And had he changed

his mind in 1980? Could he have tired of the whole thing

and just be wanting it to stay dropped? I, of course,

do not know the answres to these questions but it seems

to me that the situation certainly provides MacLennan

with a strong motive for suicide. If Pelly is telling

the truth MacLennan realised the possibility that he

might be arrested the next day and was worried that he

had no money with which to obtain bail - he would

therefore be likely to be placed in custody. On this

point, it might be worth investigating the state of

MacLennan's finance to see if this pennilessness was

a matter of fact. (See D v).

Within 12 hours of his being informed of this worrying

state of affairs MacLennan unusually left a message

that he was to be called at 5.30 a m and at 5.55 a m

Page 300Page 301

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.