TNAG-1101-FCO40-1351-Legislation-on-homosexuality-in-Hong-Kong-including--Report--1981 — Page 18

Report 750809

Comparison and Opinion Beat Equipment Register

From the notes made of Inspector Maclennan's handwriting

and those from this examination, I conducted a comparison.

insufficient

There was insufficient material in the date '15-' for me to

offer an opinion. There was

material in the

original 18.00 and the modified

modified 06.00 for me to offer an

opinion. The item 'To Whom' on two lines was limited but

the handwriting was consistent in the few personal

idiosyncrasies available, as well as the speed, pressure and

fluency with the handwriting of Inspector Maclennan. The

'Rev. No.' figures were inconsistent with Inspector

Maclennan's handwriting and the material was insufficient

to make any reasonable comparison. Similarly, the figure

'6' in the 'Amn' column could not be adequately compared.

The writing in the first line of 'Issuing/Rec. Officer' was

consistent in the few personal idiosyncrasies available, also

in the speed, fluency and pressure, with Inspector

Maclennan's handwriting. The second line was insufficient

for comparison and the numerals following that entry,

written on the vertical

line, were not consistent with

Inspector Maclennan's handwriting. The item written in the

'Remarks' column was insufficient for reasonable comparison.

I am

therefore of the opinion that the two entries in the

column 'To Whom' and one entry in the column 'Issuing/Rec.

Officer' were of common authorship with the handwriting of

Inspector Maclennan.