..
3. IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT IN THE CASE OF A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT OR INFORMATION LAID BEFORE A HONG KONG MAGISTRATE, THE LATTER COULD THEORETICALLY ISSUE AN ARREST WARRANT. COULD BE LAID BY ANY CITIZEN, IT FOLLOWS THAT A MAGISTRATE HAS
SINCE A COMPALINT THE POWER TO ISSUE A WARRANT OF ARREST IN CIRCUMSTANCES WHERE THE POLICE ARE NOT THE INITIATORS. TO THIS EXTENT, THE HONG KG GOVERNMENT WOULD NOT BE IN A POSITION TO PREVENT ARREST, THOUGH THE CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH A MEMBER OF THE CHINESE VISA OFFICE WOULD BE LIABLE TO ARREST FOLLOWING A COMPLAINT BY A LOCAL CITIZEN ARE REMOTE.
SIMILARLY, IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS (TO WHICH THE HONG KONG GOVERNMENT WOULD PROBABLY NOT BE A PARTY) IT IS REMOTELY POSSIBLE THAT FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER COULD RESULT IN THE DEFAULTER BEING IN CONTEMPT OF COURT, FOR WHICH THE ULTIMATE SANCTION COULD BE COMMITTAL TO PRISON. IF SUCH A SITUATION AROSE. PRINCIPLES OF COMMON LAW DICTATE THAT THE ADMINISTRATION COULD NOT INTERFERE WITH THE EXERCISE OF THE
COURT'S POWER.
.
THE ABOVE ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE PROPOSED VISA OFFICE IN HONG KONG ARE BASED ON THE UNDERSTANDING THAT:
(A) IT WILL BE KNOWN AS THE HONG KONG VISA OFFICE OF THE MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINAI
(B) IT WILL NOT BE A REPRESENTATIVE OFFICE OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA AND ITS FUNCTIONS WILL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ISSUE OF VISAS
ENDS
CRADOCK
NNNN
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.