TNAG-1097-FCO40-1347-Chinese-visa-office-in-Hong-Kong-1982 — Page 111

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

GR 378

SECRET

FM PEKING 190738Z

TO PRIORITY F C O

TELNO 368 OF 19 MAY 1981

INFO PRIORITY HONG KONG.

SECRET

HITI 349/1

TY. 57

MAY 184

RECEIVED

#ES

PA

INDEX

سال

REGISTRY

Action Taken

Dr.5 pan 2115

CHINESE VISA OFFICE: WILSON'S LETTER OF 4 MAY TO CLIFT

31

1. THIS IS A DIFFICULT ISSUE. LEGISLATION ALONG THE LINES PROPOSED IS ONE COURSE. IT SHOULD SATISFY THE CHINESE

REQUIREMENTS AND THUS SOLVE THE IMMEDIATE PROBLEM. IF WE ARE

TO LEGISLATE I SHOULD PREFER TO SEE A SELF-CONTAINED BILL (WILSON'S PARAGRAPH 7), IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN A CLEARER DIST-

INCTION BETWEEN THE VISA OFFICE AND FULL CONSULATES. AN

UNDERSTANDING WITH THE CHINESE AS IN WILSON'S PARAGRAPH 8

WOULD ALSO BE ESSENTIAL.

2. I AM HOWEVER CONCERNED THAT, HAVING TAKEN A ROBUST STAND

HITHERTO, WE SHOULD NOW BE SEEN TO GIVE WAY COMPLETELY UNDER

PRESSURE. HOWEVER DESIRABLE IT IS TO REMOVE THE IRRITANT THAT

THE VISA OFFICA HAS BECOME IN OUR RELATIONS WITH THE CHINESE, WE HAVE TO CONSIDER THE IMPLICATIONS IN THE WIDER CHINA/HONG

KONG CONTEXT. WE HAVE ONLY A LIMITED NUMBER OF CARDS AND ONE

IS CONTROL OVER THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT OFFICES IN HONG KONG.

PY

See 35

3. THE PROBLEM IS MADE WORSE BY THE FACT THAT A SUITABLE QUID

PRO QUO IS PROBABLY IMPOSSIBLE TO FIND. I AGREE THAT THE TRANSIT

VISA ISSUE IS BEST LEFT ALONE. I ALSO HAVE DOUBTS ABOUT RAISINF

LEGAL IMMIGRATION. THIS IS AN ISSUE THE CHINESE WILL BE UNWILLING

TO DISCUSS, AND THEY WOULD ARGUE WITH SOME JUSTIFICATION THAT IT

IS A QUITE SEPARATE ONE. UNLESS WE WERE ABLE TO ESTABLISH A LINK

BETWEEN IT AND THE VISA OFFICE (WHICH I DO NOT THINK WE COULD), THE CHINESE WOULD PROBABLY POCKET THE CONCESSION ON THE

LATTER AND IGNORE OUR REPRESENTATIONS ON LEGAL IMMIGRATION. WE

WOULD GAIN NOTHING AND WOULD RISK PUTTING CHINESE BACKS UP.

4. PACE WILSON'S PARAGRAPHS 4 AND 5. I DO NOT THINK WE ARE

COMMITTED TO LEGISLATION YET. IT WOULD STILL BE POSSIBLE FOR SOME

TIME AT LEAST TO DO NOTHING BEYOND REPEATING OUR PRESENT POSITION.

IT WOULD ALSO BE OPEN TO US TO EXPLAIN OUR INACTION FRANKLY TO THE

CHINESE, CITING LIKELY PUBLIC REACTION, PARTICULARLY GIVEN PUBLIC CONCERN ABOUT HONG KONG'S FUTURE. THIS IS AFTER ALL WHERE THE

DIFFICULTY LIES.

5. 1 FEAR THAT IN THE END WE MAY FIND SPECIAL LEGISLATION PLUS

A MEMORANDUM, THE LEAST UNPALATABLE COURSE. BUT I SHOOLD LIKE TO BE SURE WE HAVE FULLY CONSIDERED THE ALTERNATIVE. CRADOCK

LIMITED

нкаад FED

SIR-E-YOU.DE

MRDONALD

SECRET

THE TELEGRAM

WAS NOT ADVANCED

-

38

JT4

34

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.