TNAG-1036-FCO40-1286-Future-of-Hong-Kong-1981 — Page 3

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

Chinese to meet our needs on this in isolation from the major question of the future. Nevertheless, we should keep trying.

Para 4, last sentence. I do not think we should be so negative about the possibility of achieving a deal to exchange recognition of Chinese sovereignty for a continuing right for Britain to administer. It will certainly be difficult, but this is probably the best solution to play for from our point of view.

10.

As you point out in your letter, the paper does not attempt to cover tactics, either short or medium term. I have already commented on immediate tactics in my telegrams nos 115 and 116 of 4 February. We will clearly need to look again at medium-term tactics in the light of what happens during the Secretary of State's visit. Meanwhile, I see every advantage in getting on as quickly as we can with the paper and particularly consideration of the legal issues referred to above in paragraph 3.

11.

I don't know how quickly you wish to finalise the paper, but if time presses would it help if David Wilson returned to help in drafting? This would avoid the need for further detailed consideration here.

12.

Peking.

I am copying this letter to HM Ambassador in

eve

زنانه

Pp (Sir C.M. MacLehose)

SECRET

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.