TNAG-1005-FCO40-1254-Capital-punishment-in-Hong-Kong-1981 — Page 35

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

ака 380/8

RECEIVED IN S

10.

G. 5c

0 2 SEP 1981 CONFIDENTIAL REGISTRY

Red

J.S

Sir I Sinclair

PS/Mr Ridley

PA

Action Taken

en

Mr Williamson, HKG

DEB INDEX

ركات

besides

Hong Kong.

snice it could

do so

HONG KONG: CAPITAL PUNISHMENT FOR MURDER

1411)

With reference to your minute of 27 August, capital punishment is, as you know, provided for under the law of seven dependent territories namely, Anguilla, Belize, Bermuda, BVI, Cayman Islands, Montserrat and the Turks and Caicos Islands, all of which have elected legislative bodies.

2.

HMG have no power to change the law of Bermuda, Belize and (probably) Montserrat except by Act of Parliament.

3. The law of Anguilla, B.V.I., Cayman Islands and the Turks and Caicos Islands could be changed by Order in Council but it would be most unusual to do this on a domestic matter when the local legislative body was manifestly unwilling itself to pass legislation to effect the change.

4. The law of Hong Kong likewise could be changed by Order in Council. Here, too, the Legislative Council (or at any rate the unofficial members thereof) would be reluctant to effect the change, which would not be popular with many local people, but as the Legislative Council contains no elected members and as its unofficial members are, I understand, not regarded as, or intended to be, representatives of the local population, it can be argued that HMG should effect the change without appearing to flout a body democratically elected to represent the people.

5. While one might expect HMG and the expatriate civil servants who administer Hong Kong (and who, since they obviously cannot be autonomous, are subordinate to H MG in the UK) to pay some regard to the opinions of local inhabitants (in so far as such opinions can be ascertained), the fact that there are not elected members in the Legislative Council to represent those inhabitants exposes HMG to stronger outside pressure in respect of Hong Kong to impose their own measures regardless of local sentiment than would be the case in respect of colonies with their own elected legislative bodies.

6. It is presumably for this reason that successive British Governments have since the TSOI case in 1973 been impelled to bring pressure on the Governor to commute every death sentence for murder so as to ensure that none is carried out even if there is no apparent mitigating factor that would justify exercise of the Royal prerogative of mercy that is delegated to him under the constitution. Even before the Tsoi case colonial governors in Hong Kong and elsewhere were pressed by some UK administrations to commute whenever

/ possible

CONFIDENTIAL

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.