a
347
1979
}
RESTRICTED
CRS 350
STRICTED
FF IN CONFIDENCE
FN HONG KONG 030950Z JAN 80
TO PRIORITY F C O
TELEGRAM NUMBER 17 OF 3 JANUARY
HKK 43011
RECEIVED IN REGISTRY NO. 51.
· 4 JAN1980
DESK OFFICER
L
19779
INDEX
PA
YOUR TELNO 1067 OF 31 DECEMBER: MR C V PENHEAROW.
1. I APOLOGISE FOR NOT REPLYING EARLIER TO YOUR LETTER OF
REGI
Action 1
Aw
sexy
3 OCTOBER 1979 BUT MRS PENHEAROW'S CASE RAISES THE GENERAL QUESTION OF THE EXTENT TO WHICH THE HONG KONG GOVERNMENT SHOULD COMPENSATE PEOPLE FOR EXCHANGE LOSSES IN THIS ERA OF FLOATING
EXCHANGE RATES,
2. IN A CASE OF THIS TYPE ONE NEEDS TO CONSIDER WHAT IS A
REASONABLE LENGTH OF TIME FOR THE PROCEDURES IN QUESTION. WHILE
IT IS TRUE THAT IN SOME RESPECTS THERE WAS DELAY, THERE WERE
OTHER RESPECTS IN WHICH THIS CASE WAS HANDLED EXPEDITIOUSLY.
ON BALANCE I DO NOT THINK THAT THE TIME TAKEN WAS ALL THAT
UNREASONABLE. CERTAINLY MANY STRAIGHTFORWARD PROBATE CASES TAKE
LONGER.
3. IT IS ALSO NECESSARY TO CONSIDER WHAT IS AN APPROPRIATE BASE
PATE OF EXCHANGE, GIVEN THAT EXCHANGE RATES CAN VARY QUITE
SIGNIFICANTLY FROM DAY TO DAY,
4. WE ARE NOT AVARE THAT IT IS THE PRACTICE ELSEWHERE TO OFFER COMPENSATION IN THIS TYPE OF CASE, AND WE DO NOT THINK WE WOULD BE JUSTIFIED IN DOING SO IN MRS PENHEAROW'S CASE UNLESS THERE
HAD BEEN CULPABLE DELAYS OR SOME INJUSTICE,
5. YOU HAVE AGREED THAT ANY DELAYS WERE NOT CULPABLE.
6. AS REGARDS POSSIBLE INJUSTICE, IT IS RELEVANT THAT I (ROWLANDS) ASSIGNED ONE OF MY SENIOR STAFF TO GIVE HER ALL THE
HELP SHE NEEDED, HE TOOK HER TO THE TREASURY TO HAVE EXPLAINED
TO HER THE VARIOUS THINGS SHE NEEDED TO DO TO OBTAIN LETTERS
OF ADMINISTRATION AND HE CLEARED HER VISIT TO THE PROBATE OFFICE
OF THE HIGH COURT BY ADVANCE TELEPHONE CALLS.
RESTRICTED
17.
Page 360Page 361
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.