CONFIDENTIAL #3
:
-9-
(g) the political argument for an airport
in China is dubious unless there is a
surrender of sovereignty to HMG for a
period beyond 1997, a remote possibility
(see (c) above). For Hong Kong, even the
Government of Hong Kong, simply to
secure a lease of land in China for use
as an airport extending beyond 1997
would do little to guarantee the future
of Hong Kong itself. Much greater
confidence would derive from the
arrangements necessary for an airport
sited in Hong Kong to be viable (paragraph
7 above) Though a major joint project
•
could make for confidence, the field of
air transport is a particularly
difficult one in which to reach agreement.
There is a danger that failure to reach
agreement with China would be extremely
damaging to confidence; or that to
avoid such failure it would be necessary
to make the far reaching concessions
referred to in (c) and (d) above;
(h)
unless completely satisfied as to the
financial security none of the companies
providing services at Kai Tak would be
prepared to invest in new facilities in
China (nor in Chek Lap Kok either).
G.F. 326
CONFIDENTIAL ##
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.