TNAG-0944-FCO40-1163-Future-of-Hong-Kong-1980 — Page 134

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

SECRET

DSR 11C

7. Another possibility would be to issue leases to run

beyond 1997 and only introduce legislation by Order in

Council if their validity should be challenged in court.

This would then need careful explaining to the Chinese.

Alternatively, should they be warned in advance of what we

were doing?

8. If the idea of issuing leases beyond 1997 is not feasible

(for our own legal reasons or because of likely Chinese

objections), can we improve on the existing Chinese

assurances? One possibility would be a statement by the

Chinese that, as far as they were concerned, the holders of

leases issued by the "present authorities in Hong Kong" would

be able to continue to enjoy the use of land after 1997

whatever the eventual political arrangements. In the absence

of this, would Chinese private assurances to individual

investors be helpful?

9. How should we react to any Chinese request for a politi-

cal price in return for their help over leases? Possibilities

are:

(a) Chinese official representation in Hong Kong;

(b) Some kind of British recognition (public or confidential)

of ultimate Chinese sovereignty over Hong Kong.

Any concession on our part on (a) or (b) should only be made

if we got a cast-iron undertaking on continuing British

administration.

We would then be into the renegotiation of

our whole position in Hong Kong.

10. How significant is the China Resources project at Tin

Shui Wai in the New Territories? Any further indications of

official Chinese attitude?

11. Significance of other major projects on both sides of the border (e.g. Guangdong nuclear project, new airport).

airport is at Lantao, how difficult will it be to raise

If the

SECRET

/finance

S4200(22454) DD.0532198 300M 7/79 GWB LTD.GP.870

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.