TNAG-0943-FCO40-1162-Future-of-Hong-Kong-1980 — Page 87

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

Registry No.

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

Secret.

Contiderrcial.

Prosserieted.

Unclassified.

PRIVACY MARKING

In Confidence

DRAFT

To:-

SECRET

Type 1 +

From

Telephone No. Ext.

Department

DSR 11

SOVEREIGNTY OVER HONG KONG

1. At paragraph 1(c) of his minute of 16 May on

New Territories Leases, Mr Clift suggests that we should be prepared in case the Chinese propose some kind of statement implying our recognition of their ultimate sovereignty over Hong Kong, and asks whether

this would affect the current basis of British

administration in the territory.

2. So far as I can judge, China has never yet proposed such a statement. Rather, there has been a parallel series of assertions of sovereignty over Hong Hong on the part of China and Britain. Though a conflict of claims is inherent in the situation, China has not

yet directly challenged us to defend our claim or asked

us to recognise its own.

3.

There are, of course, two different types of territory involved in considering Hong Kong; the ceded and the leased parts. In the past, the Nationalist Chinese, possibly as a negotiating tactic, appeared ready to confine their claims to the leased territories in the first instance. In turn, the Foreign Office has, in its guidance to posts (Intel telegram of 23 June 1964), advised that "the question of sovereignty over the leased territories is not entirely free from doubt" and counselled against making a "wholesale denial of Chinese claims to sovereignty" over these territories. The interdependence between the ceded parts, Hong Kong and Kowloon, and the leased parts makes it difficult in

/practice

SECRET

Dd 0532000 800M 5/78 HMSO Bracknell

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.