7.
SECRET
-3-
b) To issue leases beyond 1997 for a fixed term. These
would obviously be more attractive to investors but would
probably require new legislation. We would need to see how
receptive the Chinese were before pursuing this idea.
We would have to explain the legal difficulties although
we would be able to make clear that it would not be
necessary for an Order in Council to refer to the Continualini
(combination of British administration after 1997 (the
point which probably caused the Chinee most trouble
when we made our proposals last year).
There is some disagreement between the Governor and
Sir P Cradock as to whether enabling legislation should best be
made before any leases were issued or retroactively, ie only if
and when some part (eg a sub-lessee) challenged the validity of
a lease in the courts. The Ambassador favours the former course,
the Governor the latter. I believe strongly that we should keep
both options open. We cannot be sure which would be seen by the
Chinese as likely to cause less embarrassment. Since the important
point is that any scheme must be endorsed by Peking, it would be
wrong to take a firm decision now.
Бир
5 September 1980
CC FED
SECRET
R D Clift
Hong Kong and General Department
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.