SECRET
-4-
acknowledgement we would want from them in order to satisfy
investors that their position was indeed underwritten beyond
1997. We cannot be too ambitious here. Anything referring to
continuing British administration is almost certainly out.
It may, however, be possible to get a statement confirming that
the general assurances already made refer to real estate and
specifically to land leased from 'the authorities in Hong Kong'
or some such phrase.
8.
-
This suggests that when the Secretary of State visits China
in October he should, as the Governor suggests, start on the
short-term problem of land leases. This would not exclude agreeing
on a dialogue on the long-term future: we do not want to rebuff
the Chinese if they are really ready to talk. But it would be
a mistake to allow a continuing exchange on an evolving situation
to hold up work on the leases question.
9.
The Governor and Ambassador have also discussed the question
of our response if the Chinese were to demand some kind of
political quid pro quo for a more forthcoming attitude on the
leases question. A possibility might be a declaration on our part
on ultimate Chinese sovereignty over the territory, possibly
coupled with agreement to their longstanding request to have an
official representative in Hong Kong. This would have to be
looked at very carefully. A declaration on sovereignty would posė
major legal problems and could of course in itself disturb
confidence in Hong Kong if it were not part of a satisfactory
package. In practice, however, it seems unlikely that the Chinese
are thinking on these lines at present.
9 July 1980
CC FED
Drip
SECRET
R D Clift
Hong Kong and General Department
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.