TNAG-0929-FCO40-1147-Protection-of-Trading-Interests-Bill-extension-to-Dependent--1980 — Page 35

ouse Farrell (HKGD)

Reference

والنا

so for

Brow

The key park of the proposed Saving telegram is, Surely, what action the recipitate should take du The draft supplied by the DOT says

receipt.

in pack 5

а

4

you may

wish to consider whether

the new act should be applied in your territory .... Your peres

you may wish to take eacly action to see whether the new ack should be applied in your

of treft says

teintory

2 Are we

&

urging fovernate to take each action?

so, could the wording in the draft be strengthened

If so,

and clarified?

Could we say why

ns

then to take early actida?

ye Bone)

Saving ändlossified"

is now

مرو

are urging

we Qe

we are not unging

them there, could we uch revert to the doT wording?

3. I am not clear why the Sairingram He should be

The fibralta: foot. might wish to debate in

Restricted.

the House of Assembly, discuss with lawyers of the

Chamber

f

Commerce.

The DOT draft is undessified

дот

I recommend the savingram be unclassified.

CODE 18-77

SS 8/78

C KEITH

SED

30.5

GUER