4.
CO
What is the reason for requiring Feo approval of these
substitution appointments?
Surely not just that the fovernor of
Tucks & Caicos failed de bue dccasion to read the constitution of his territory with dus case?
5. I would expect Gibraltar to be opposed to the reference
now proposed on at least two important grounds:
constitutionally
(i) It would be a retrograde step, removing from the fovernor authority
which he has previously exercised (for
Je
years), and might head local îfficials to believe that the fee did uch have confidence in his ability to administer his public service in accordance with the constitutional authority given to him
tedious bureaucratic chore if every
(ii) It would be a
6.
Due
trip,
Func
the listed senior officials left the territory (for a sailing
a weekend in Morocco,
this year; for
3 days duty visit in Londen
a visiti to relatives, or
a bull- fight, in Spain
perhaps next yeas), the foverner had to telegraph for formal
approval from the Secretary of State for his substitute
has, of course, to be
SEI would therefore
case
as
of his den absences.
want to know, and be allowed to comment on,
for the requirements before it is incorporated in
that
should
Q
the reasdus
despatch. We
would also prefer of fibraltar out to consulted informally
before
Q
despatch issued. But if this were not possible, we
reasons for the requirement explained in
would like to see the reasons
the despatch.
спасая
28.2
CREITH SED
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.