5
an advance commitment on aid.
We next met with the Vietnamese in New York for several
rounds of informal discussions in the fall of last year.
Initially, the Vietnamese appeared reluctant to aband on
their position on aid but eventually stated flatly that they ́
would not longer demand a U.S. commitment on bilateral economic
assistance as a quid pro quo for normalization. In addition,
the Vietnamese indicated they would continue to make efforts
to provide us with an MIA accounting. For our part, we
reiterated our belief that the Vietnamese should be doing more
to provide us with an accounting of our MIAS. As Bob Oakley
indicated during his testimony last month, when troublesome
developments of concern to us began to appear in Vietnamese.
actions and statements during the fall, we asked the Vietnamese
for clarification. We requested that the Vietnamese inform us
of their intentions toward Kampuchea, given the massive SRV
罩
troop buildup then underway along their border with that country,
increasingly harsh Vietnamese public statements attacking the
Kampuchean government and calling upon the Kampuchean people
to rise up in revolt against it, and announced Vietnamese
support for the so-called National Salvation Front as the
preferred replacement government. In so doing, we made clear
that we were not taking sides in Vietnam's dispute with Kampuchea,
that we ourselves had long been at the forefront of those
nations denouncing the Pol Pot Government for its terrible
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.