TNAG-0871-FCO40-1081-Air-services-between-Hong-Kong-and-the-UK-1979 — Page 69

mande

direction on policy,prounds (nava

AM

grounds are still valid and woul

Who. A

CA

a

case for asking him to reconsider his lion joi

Z

We agree that in Nott is likely to weɔme consideration of the application, because i

ཀྭ འ i'

in the circumstances if no appeal wor m

}

be

aminer atever

3

iL

that 11 tic

:

1

whether or not CAA on' the

the CAA may come to. An appeal would be lindy he ** Secretary of State had previourly given a directio applicants should be on equal otin ATLA had reached the same conclusion. e share your hope is a public dispute can be avoided. The comment which we maio in parts, trang 5 of our telno 67 are of course relevent to the goal stare.

+

4 Your second TIR. The DOT a’e Aviation Bill covering a number of

ing to

a Civil

ugeren?

ill in bi

prepared for publication early is the te

whic.

Ministers are aware of the points thie, you ben.

上

100