ob
CONFIDENTIAL
R 315
CONFIDENTIAL
FM HONG KONG 170909Z MAY 79
TO PRIORITY FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH OFFICE
TELNO.596 OF 17 MAY,
INFO PRIORITY: PEKING,
ROUTINE : HONG KONG GOVT OFFICE LONDON.
ரு
HKK 184/2. P.A
KELEIVED WA
18 MAY 1979
از
INDEX
T. ken
ло
718.5
&
Sex 113
FOLLOWING FOR SAMUEL (FED) AND MCLARE
N (HKGD)
FROM POLITICAL ADVISER.
MY TELNO.583: AIR SERVICES AGREEMENT.
1. DURING MEETINGS WITH ROGERS WE DISCUSSED AT SOME LENGTH
OUR VIEW THAT THE CHINESE WERE LIKELY TO INSIST ON SEPARATE
ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE ''REGIONAL'' SERVICES BETWEEN HONG KONG
AND CHINA AND FOR THESE TO BE AGREED DIRECTLY BETWEEN D.C.A
HONG KONG AND CAAC GUANGZHOU. WE REPEATED THE VIEW, ALREADY
RECORDED IN EARLIER TELEGRAMS, THAT WE WOULD HAVE NO OBJECTION
TO SUCH AN ARRANGEMENT AND COULD INDEED SEE AN ADVANTAGE IF
IT AVOIDED A WRANGLE ABOUT THE STATUS OF HONG KONG.
2.
ROGERS ARGUED THAT A LOCAL ARRANGEMENT OF THIS SORT WOULD
NOT BE ACCEPTABLE SINCE
(i) SCHEDULED SERVICES MUST BE NEGOTIATED BY THE DEPARTMENT
OF TRADE ON BEHALF OF H.M.G AND
(11) SUCH A LOCAL ARRANGEMENT WOULD UNDERMINE H.M.G'S POSITION
ON SOVEREIGNTY OVER HONG KONG.
THE FIRST ARGUMENT IS OF COURSE FAMILIAR AND NOT ONE TO WHICH WE WOULD WISH TO OBJECT. WE WOULD SEE ANY LOCAL ARRANGEMENT,
IF THAT IS WHAT THE CHINESE INSIST ON, AS BEING UNDER THE
UMBRELLA OF D.O.T AND H.M.G'S APPROVAL. THE ARGUMENT ABOUT
SOVEREIGNTY SURPRISED ME. AS SEEN FROM HERE, NOTHING WOULD BE LOST IN TERMS OF SOVEREIGNTY BY A LOCAL ARRANGEMENT SUCH AS THE
CHINESE SEEM TO BE ENVISAGING. THE THROUGH TRAIN IS A SIMILAR
LOCAL ARRANGEMENT.
CONFIDENTIAL
3. SINCE ROGERS
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.