TNAG-0858-FCO40-1068-Proposed-UK-China-bilateral-shipping-agreement-1979 — Page 70

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

43

FSR 3164/6

CONFIDENTIAL

DEPARTMENT OF TRADE

MR Morland Esq

1 VICTORIA STREET

HKK RECEIVED

INDEX

по

LONDON SWIH DET

15/2

Y 60. 51

12 APR 1979

REGISTRY Action Taken

J17.48

Foreign & Commonwealth Office

MAED

Room 66A/1

Government Offices

Great George Street

London SW1A 2AH

Ресь Мсова

Telephone Direct Line

Switchboard

01215 5624

01-215 7877

11 April 1979

PROPOSED UK/CHINA MARITIME AGREEMENT

In your letter of 3 April, you asked me for a clear statement of the benefits which UK shipowners could expect to derive from a Maritime Agreement and how they would be disadvantaged ir no such agreement were secured.

2 In my view the benefits to UK shipowners would be both practical and psychological.

3

In the particular circumstances of shipping services to a developing state-trading country such as China, it is clearly advantageous to have assurance of:

a) protection against flag discrimination,

b)

most favoured nation treatment in operational matters,

c)

expedition and simplification of port formalities,

d) diplomatic and consular access to crew members,

e) relief from shipping taxes.

Although these taxes are at a relatively low level, they could make the difference between breaking even and making a loss in present circumstances.

4

These practical benefits, which would provide the basic for more assured opportunities for UK shipping, are already enjoyed by most of the world's major shipping notions. Maritime Agreements with China were concluded between 1973 and-1976 by:

Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Japan, Sweden.

CONFIDENTIAL

/ The

MG

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.