1
13
Public Transport Fares and Viability of MTR
So much, Sir, for the monopoly argument: Τ
should now like to make it quite clear to Mr. WU and Mr.
LO that there has never been any intention of revising
surface public transport fares, routes and services solely
to make the MTR viable, and no such assumption was made in
the calculations of passengers and revenues for the MTR,
which have shown the MTR to be viable. These calculations
have been based on the assumption that the MTR will be
operating in a competitive environment with buses, PLBs
and ferries.
✩
As in the past, surface public transport fares,
routes and frequencies will continue to be revised only
when the interests of the travelling public as a whole are
thus best served. But the mere presence of the MTR
carrying about one million passengers a day in 1981 on the
MIS and, 1.8 million passengers on the combined MIS and
Tsuen Wan system in 1986, will necessitate nevertheless
some "reshaping" of existing public transport. Let me
stress again, however, the rational for this "reshaping"
will be to improve the overall level of service provided
for the public.
As I said earlier, the precise nature of the
"reshaping" that will be most appropriate can only be
determined by a detailed public transport study. To this
/ end
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.