TNAG-0845-FCO40-1055-Visits-of-Foreign-and-Commonwealth-officials-to-Hong-Kong-1979 — Page 81

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

MR MURRAY'S VISIT TO HONG KONG: DISCUSSIONS WITH CHIEF SECRETARY/ ATTORNEY-GENERAL ON 24 SEPTEMBER

CAPITAL AND CORPORAL PUNISHMENT

Capital Punishment

1.

We do not know what policy the Government wish to adopt towards the question of capital punishment in the dependent territories, in the light of the recent rejection by the House of Commons of the proposal to reintroduce capital punishment for murder in this country. A submission will shortly be put to Minister indicating the options available which, as we see it, are:

(i) To maintain the "Creech-Jones doctrine", under which

Ministers in London do not intervene in local decisions;

(ii) to invite the Governors of those territories where capital

punishment still exists to introduce local legislation to abolish it;

(iii) to abolish capital punishment in all dependent territories

by legislative action in the UK.

2.

+

It would be helpful to know whether, from the Hong Kong point of view, any one of these options is clearly preferable to the others. It would also be helpful to have an indication of likely local reactions to the various options, e.g.:

(a) If Ministers adopted option (i), would Exco continue to

recommend the commutation of all death sentences?

(b) Is there now any possibility that Legco would pass legis-

lation to abolish capital punishment, whether or not a specific request was made to the Governor?

(c) Would there be a strong local reaction if the abolition of

capital punishment were imposed by the UK Parliament?

/Background

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.