amongst more militant unions to band together. This would undoubtedly
accelerate if the government removed obstacles to federation and widened
representation on the SCSC. Up to the present, it has been more content to
exploit the status quo of union fragmentation. Some reforms, such as the
establishment of a Junior Civil Service Council, have been mooted. These
hardly amount to anything more than cosmetic changes while the right of
unions to negotiate, central to the present controversy, is denied.
The right to bargain issue is shrouded in a barrage of rhetoric and
accusations from both sides. Unions argue the government is authoritatian in
its dealings with staff, while the government, for its part, accuses the
unions of being inmature in their attitudes and amateur in their submissions.
Both criticisms have a basis of truth. Overall, nore sympathy can be felt
with the union case because their failings in part emanate from government
intransigence and paternalism. Their criticisms of present staff relations
all have a basis of truth. It is not up to them to be any more objective than
that.
That unions openly challenge the basis and application of salary
grading, promotion and fringe benefit policies is seen by government officials
as somehow unfair. Yet the government determined these unilaterally and there
is little reason for unions to accept criteria they had no say in deciding,
Under existing arrangements, there is no ambit for resolving this conflict.
The official side philosophy sees conflict as anathema. Discussion by
delegated representatives on appropriate issues is acceptable but not overt
bartering over principles or conditions of service. The government appears to
view the present situation as preferable to enlarging union representation on
the SCSC and hoping this will diffuse at least some dissent. Given the lop-
sided nature of consultation machinery this choice may represent an accurate,
if short term, assessment. It is unlikely that union officials with a growing
sense of frustration and confrontation would act in a subdued manner at SCSC
meetings. Rather, they might see it as a public forum for extracting
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.