CONFIDENTAL
5. I THOUGHT THAT YOU SHOULD BE AWARE OF THIS DEMAND, TO W H WE
ARE NOT (REPEAT NOT) INCLINED TO ACCEDE, IN CASE THE HERITAGE SOCIETY SHOULD APPROACH SOME PRESERVATIONIST GROUP IN BRITAIN FOR
SUPPORT.
6. SO FAR AS HONG KONG IS CONCERNED, WE WANT TO GO AHEAD AS FAST
AS POSSIBLE WITH THE DEMOLITION OF A USELESS AND ABANDONED RAILWAY STATION, ABOUT 60 YEARS OLD, TO MAKE WAY FOR A SUPERB NEW
CULTURAL CENTRE, INCLUDING BOTH A LARGE THEATRE AND A BIG CONCERT
HALL. THIS IS A BADLY NEEDED FACILITY WHICH WILL ENRICH THE LIFE OF
THE COMMUNITY. WE BELIEVE THAT THE DECISION TO PROCEED WITH
DEMOLITION AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW COMPLEX HAS MET WITH
GENERAL PUBLIC APPROVAL. OUR SURVEYS OF PUBLIC OPINION CONFIRM THAT
THE GENERAL PUBLIC HAVE NO PARTICULAR AFFECTION FOR THE OLD
STATION, WITH THE POSSIBLE EXCEPTION OF THE CLOCK TOWER. THE
HERITAGE SOCIETY IS THE ONLY GROUP WHICH HAS CONTINUED TO PROTEST.
7. I HOPE THAT YOU WILL AGREE THAT WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW THE
SUBMISSION OF A PETITION TO THE QUEEN, OR THE THREAT OF ONE, TO
HOLD UP THIS NECESSARY DEVELOPMENT ANY LONGER. DELAY WOULD BE
PARTICULARLY UNFORTUNATE IN THIS CASE WHEN WE HAVE ALREADY DELAYED
ONCE IN ORDER TO ALLOW A PETITION. IT WOULD ALSO INVOLVE THE
ACCEPTANCE OF THE UNDESIRABLE PRINCIPLE THAT ANY PUBLIC PROJECT SHOULD BE POSTPONED UNTIL OBJECTORS HAVE NOT ONLY EXHAUSTED LOCAL RECOURSE BUT HAVE BEEN GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY TO PETITION THE QUEEN.
MACLEHOSE
FILES
HReGD (5)
ред
CRO
MR CORMAZZI
MR MURRAY
2
CONFIDENTAL
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.