TNAG-0767-FCO40-971-Supplies-of-electrical-power-for-Hong-Kong-Castle-Peak-power-1978 — Page 136

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

Treasury Chambers

Parliament Street London SW1P 3AG

Telex 262405

HKK 164/1 W. D

1 7 MAY 1978

MO. 51

REGI RY

INDEX

PA/

Action Teken

Telephone Direct Line-04-239-

Switchboard12333000

Birch Esq

Export Credits Guarantee Department Aldermanbury House

Aldermanoury

London

EC2P 2EL

Your reference

Our reference

AEF 3 17/68/01

Date

15 May 1978

dees

1115

1104,

GEC TURBINE GENERATORS NUMBERS 3 AND 4 AND BALFOUR BEATTY TRANSMISSION

LINE FOR HONG KONG

You wrote to Joan Kelley on 5 May proposing support for GEC and Balfour Beatty in contracts worth up to £280 million on terms substantially

imilar to those agreed for the signed contract for GEC Units 1 and 2. Since you wrote, you will have seen comments from the Bank of England, a letter from Drummond Cameron about the principles at stake in cost escalation cover, and a letter from the Department of Industry about

ossible support by the CEGB for the work now under discussion.

The combined value of the two contracts would be £280 million which, you say, Includes escalation but not so as to preclude the need for cost escalation cover, at any rate for the GEC contract. Details of the nezu for this cover are not yet available but the point of principle is that there is a probable necessity to make the cover effective as long as 13 months after the base date. For the reasons given by Drummond Cameron, and also because I understand the resulting lower eligible value is likely

o offset most of the disadvantage, I accept his proposal in principle.

The terms proposed now, like those for Units 1 and 2, are that ECGL so support 35% of the UK supply, with a further 15% of UK supply towards local costs. Repayments would again be over 8 years from commission.des subject to the small degree of flexibility which you have described and

you will clear with our Consensus partners. The interest would n e Consensus rate of 7%. What is perhaps more important in present matances is that the loan financing would be, as before, in US

We agree entirely that sterling financing should not be smolated at this stage nor regarded as likely at any later stage. sungosh chat the concessions you mention (local cost financing, minimu Cor sensus 1nterest rate, and cost escalation provisions) would have to Peronsidered in such a way as to deter the borrowers from pressing for

eling financing.

ove that the price of extending the offer of basic cover until ch 1970 when the cost escalation scheme is due to expire, unless

nded will be an irrevocable commitment fee of £125,000 payable by

Light and Power and Esso.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.