GR 450
PRIORITY
YPHER CAT A
TRUM LISBON 1116302 JULY
CONFIDENTIAL
TO PRIORITY FCO TEL NO 231 OF 11 JULY
INFO PRIORITY HONG KONG AND PEKING
CONFIDENTIAL
HKK40/1
འ་
1% !!! 1978.
OFFIC
PA
REC
No
See 65
36
56
YOUR TELS NOS 213 TO LISBON AND 514 TO HONG KONG AND HONG KONG TM
TEL NO 8860: HONG KONG AND MACAU
(8603
FOLITICAL DIRECTOR AND OTHER OFFICIALS WHO ACCOMPANIED FOREIGN MINISTER TO LONDON LUNCHED WITH ME TODAY. I GAVE VILLAS~BOAS
DOCUMENTS LISTED IN PARA 1 OF YOUR TEL NO 213 AND SPOKE TO HIM AGAIN IN TERMS OF PARA 2 OF THAT TELEGRAM, GIST OF WHICH I HAD
ALREADY GIVEN HIM IN LONDON,
VILLAS-BOAS SAID THAT NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE CHINESE IN PARIS
WERE CONTINUING BUT THAT POSITION REMAINED EXACTLY AS IT WAS WHEN
SA MACHADO TALKED TO YOU ON 30 JUNE, PORTUGUESE HAD NOT YET DECIDED WHETHER TO RESPOND TO CHINESE PROPOSAL ABOUT MACAU AND; IF SO, IN WHAT TERMS.
3. THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO QUESTION OF ANY CONFUSION IN PORTUGUESE
MINDS BETWEEN TAIWAN AND MACAU AS SUGGESTED IN PARA 3 OF YOUR TEL
NO 122. PORTUGUESE SAY THAT AT THE PARIS TALKS CHINESE BEGAN
BY REFERRING TO THE PORTUGUESE GOVERNMENT. STATEMENT OF 6 JANUARY 1975, REPORTED IN CLARK'S LETTER TO MARCH, FAR EASTERN DEPARTMENT OF FOLLOWING DAY. THE CHINESE SAID THAT THE PART OF THIS STATEMENT
REFERRING TO TAIWAN (IE RECOGNISING THAT IT WAS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE REPUBLIC OF CHINA) WAS SATISFACTORY BUT THAT THEY HOPED
THAT THE PORTUGUESE WOULD BE PREPARED TO CO A LITTLE FURTHER
THAN THEY HAD GONE IN THAT STATEMENT ON MACAU (WHEN THEY HAD SAID
THAT IT COULD BE THE GUBJECT OF NEGOTIATIONS AT A MOMENT CONVENIENT TO THE TWO GOVERNMENTS) THEY HAD EXPRESSED THE HOPE THAT THE PORTUGUESE WOULD NOW RECOGNISE THAT MACAU WAS CHINESE TERRITORY
THOUGH THEY DID NOT REPEAT NOT ASK THAT SUCH RECOGNITION SHOULD
BE MADE PUBLICLY OR FOR EXAMPLE INCLUDED IN THE EVENTUAL COMMUNIQUE
ABOUT THE RE-ESTABLISHMENT OF DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS BUT APPARENTLY IMPLIED THAT THEY MIGHT WANT TO USE IT WHEN THE TIME WAS RIPE,
*
CONFIDENTIAL
/ THE PORTUGUESE
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.