GPS 245
SECRET
SECRET
298
RM FCO 011052Z DEC 78.
TO PRIORITY HAMILTON
TELEGRAM NUMBER PERSONAL 60 OF 1 DECEMBER.
PERSONAL FOR GOVERNOR FROM CORTAZZI.
295 YOUR TELNO PERSONAL 76: CAPITAL PUNISHMENT.
1. THE POSITION REMAINS VERY MUCH AS DESCRIBED IN THE PUS'S LETTER 211) OF 4 APRIL. MINISTERS HAVE STILL NOT DECIDED WHEN IT WOULD BE
OPPORTUNE TO REVIEW THE CURRENT POLICY, ALTHOUGH IT REMAINS THEIR INTENTION TO SEEK PARLIAMENT'S VIEWS IN DUE COURSE. FOR YOUR OWN INFORMATION, IT IS EXTREMELY UNLIKELY THAT TIME CAN BE FOUND FOR A DEBATE ON THIS SUBJECT DURING THE PRESENT PARLIAMENTARY SESSION.
2. THE ARGUMENTS AGAINST REMOVING THE GOVERNOR'S DISCRETION IN CAPITAL CASES (YOUR PARAGRAPH 7)STILL SEEM TO US TO BE OVER- RIDING. APART FROM THE CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGA. PROBLEMS REFERRED 10 TO IN MY LETTER OF 3 MARCH, EXPERIENCE OVER THE LAST FEW MONTHS MKC 380/2 HAS UNDERLINED THE IMPORTANCE OF ENSURING THAT THE ULTIMATE DECISION IS TAKEN BY SOMEONE WHO IS NOT LIKELY TO BE SWAYED
Y LOCAL FEELINGS. IN ADDITION, MINISTERS WILL WISH TO CONSULT FARLIAMMENT BEFORE CHANGING THE PRESENT POLICY IN ANY IMPORTANT
ESPECT: AND I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT THEY WOULD WISH TO PROPOSE A CHANGE WHICH MIGHT RESULT IN MORE EXECUTIONS.
3. IF THE APPEAL IN THE CHESTERFIELD JOHNSON CASE (YOUR PARA- GRAPHS 5 AND 6), IS REJECTED, AND IT SEEMS TO YOU THAT FURTHER FSYCHIATRIC OPINION WOULD BE VALUABLE, WE SHOULD BE GLAD TO EXPLORE THE POSSIBILITY OF SENDING SOMEONE OUT FROM THE UK. WE
AND THE GOVERNOR FOUND THIS HELPFUL IN A RECENT CASE IN THE
B.V.1. AND GIBBONS THOUGHT THIS A USEFUL IDEA WHEN I SPOKE TO
HIM IN JUNE.
OWEN
PS/PUS
MR CORTAZZI MR STRATTON
tkc
3867
RELENCO 2 PERISTY NO. 51
4DEC 1978
FILES
HK & GD
WIAD
PS
PS/MK ROWLANDS
MR RUSHFORD
SECRET
No
DESK OFFICER
INDEX
PA
REGISTRY Action Taken
821124 EX
Mr Stratton
Mr Cortazzi
CONFIDENTIAL
COVERING SECRET
HCG 386/1 Hica
RECENTIO
J
4DEC 1978
DISK OFFLER
INDEX
No
PA
NO. 51
REGISTRY
Action Takon
shot ех
294
CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IN DEPENDENT TERRITORIES:
Flag A 1.
(295)
Flag B
11
Flag C
Mac 38672
Flag D
BERMUDA
In his telegram No. Personal 76 of 24 November, Sir P
Ramsbotham has reported that the Select Committee of the Bermuda Legislature on Capital Punishment is expected to recommend that the death penalty should be retained for
certain categories of murder, and that this recommendation
is likely to be accepted by the Legislature. In this con-
text, and because he may soon have to decide whether or not to reprieve a convicted murderer, he has asked to be informed of the Government's present intentions over policy towards capital punishment in dependent territories.
2. In fact there have been no significant developments
since the PUS wrote to the Governor on 4 April. Ministers have not yet decided when would be the right time to review the current policy, but Mr Stephen has confirmed that it is very unlikely that time could be found for a debate during the current Parliamentary session.
3. In the last paragraph of his telegram the Governor reverts to a proposal which he first put forward in discussion
with the Secretary of State on 8 February, to the effect that
the recommendations of the Governor's Advisory Committee on the Prerogative of Mercy should be made binding on the Governor in capital cases. Mr Cortazzi explained in his letter of 3 March that this suggestion had been considered by Ministers, who had decided that the arguments against it out-
Sir P Ramsbotham now questions
HKC 386/2 weighed those in its favour.
нка
that decision: he argues that the proposed change would not necessarily result in more executions; and that the Secretary of State would be better placed to reply to criticism in the
CONFIDENTIAL
COVERING SECRET
/UK
CONFIDENTIAL
COVERING SECRET
- 2 -
-
UK if he could show that the decision to allow an execution
had been taken by local Ministers rather than by the Governor.
4. On the first point, Sir P Ramsbotham may be right as far as Bermuda is concerned (though he himself acknowledges that local feeling is very much in favour of capital punishment in certain kinds of case). But we must also take account of the strong probability that if such a change were made in Bermuda there would be pressures to introduce it in other territories where local Ministers may be less responsible, and that these pressures would be very difficult to resist. Recent experience over the Gaston case in the British Virgin Islands, and in the Greenaway case in Montserrat, has clearly demonstrated the importance of maintaining the Governor's present role in these territories,
however uncomfortable it may be.
5. As for Sir P Ramsbotham's second point, it seems to me that the proposed change would make the Secretary of State's position more, not less difficult since he might find himself having to advise The Queen in such cases more frequently than he does now. He might also be open to the charge of having gone further down the road of responsibility without power. There is in addition an important political consideration. In view of their repeated undertaking to seek Parliament's views on the question whether dependent territories should be allowed to retain capital punish- ment, it seems to me very unlikely that Ministers would wish to change the present policy in any important respect without consulting Parliament. And I cannot believe that a change on the lines advocated by Sir P Ramsbotham, which could (though it might not) result in more executions, would be the kind of change which Ministers would wish to propose.
6. The particular capital case referred to by the Governor is that of Chesterfield Johnson, whose appeal against the death sentence passed on him in July is to be heard early next month.
/Details
CONFIDENTIAL
COVERING SECRET
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.