TNAG-0719-FCO40-917-Capital-punishment-in-the-Dependent-Territories-1978 — Page 101

CONFIDENTIAL

have been seen as in no way connected with the Burrows/Tacklyn executions, was I believe misguided. Sir P Ramsbotham was apparently told that he would have a much better chance of guiding both parties in Bermuda quietly and peacefully to eventual independence if it had been seen that he had not taken any part in the decision-making process. In colonial societies, and in particular mixed race societies, such as exists in Bermuda, the Governor's reputation and authority rest firmly on the public's feeling that he is the ultimate administrative authority and that he, as Governor, is seen to take responsibility for the actions of his Government. There is little doubt that the agitation against the executions in Bermuda was a political ploy by the Opposition. In a free vote in the House of Assembly, the House as late as 1975, had voted overwhelmingly for the retention of capital punishment. I believe that Sir P Ramsbotham's authority and reputation in Bermuda, and his chances of guiding the two political parties, would have been enhanced had he been able to show at such an early stage in his Governorship that he accepted the responsibility as well as the authority that went with the post. No-one can blame Sir P Ramsbotham himself. He had only been Governor for less than eight weeks and had no previous experience of dependent territories' government. The blame must lie on his advisers.

4.

The departmental legal adviser and WIAD concur.

9.00. B. Beaut.

9 January 1978

cc: Mr Stratton o.r.

Sir Ian Sinclair

Mr Rushford Mr Duff (WIAD)

JA B Stewart

Hong Kong & General Department

/I have

CONFIDENTIAL