TNAG-0715-FCO40-911-Future-of-the-Dependent-Territories-4 — Page 82

Mh Fay

бы

the

affais

your pare. 2. I think it is reasonable that there should be some inter-departmental consideration of a propause for CPP, but not reasonable that RD shaded look at this for the reason you give. Perhaps TAFE could look at it However,

how it should be done; it is not for us to say just point that I want to brake in relating to our own is that CPP's can help

us to get less day-to-day

a mile tie ODM too tightly interference. They do not es to particular levels of aid, - through "switching" can usually be justified either on the grounds that it is not inconsistent with the now outdated. But the Cpp CPP or because gives other bepartment the feeling that they have a in policy towards different countries which they are bound to want to have,

say

minimum cost.

2-

Gn

the CPP is

your pane. 3,

a new initiative, eq.

at what

Suffest is the

I think we can leave it to

Mr. Fagnity to fight th. Buttert suggestion; but I doubt whether inflexibility would be a

ut to

a food aigument suggest to him, because it would arouse suspicious

しふと

must rely

all round Whitehall. Agour absence of complete precision in CPPL to

the necessary

on the

five.

latitude (and in any case, we we not usually thinking so much of the smaller recipients when we consider switching).

3.

9

apee with X in your pane. 4. I think we should say something in the briefing for the Minister neeting; the kind of message I would like to get

is that the CPP system should fave

over

the Treasury

Carind