TNAG-0715-FCO40-911-Future-of-the-Dependent-Territories-4 — Page 61

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

CONFIDENTIAL

www.

2

Reference

Suffice

7. EAD are minuting separately about British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT). to say that both BIOT and Ascension Island will be required for Anglo/US defence purposes for the foreseeable future As neither has an indigenous population the

questions of independence and defence guarantees would not appear to arise.

8.

I agree with you that the idea of a UN guarantee is not a starter. Except in the special circumstances of Korea there has never been an occasion when UN forces have been commited in a combat role to repel an invader. UN military operations have been limited to the provision of peacekeeping forces after a conflict has broken out involving Member States. But a defence guarantee involves one party (or parties) committing itself to come to the aid of others in certain specified circumstances. I cannot envisage circumstances in which members of the UN would be willing to guarantee British Territories against an unspecified post-independence threat of aggression which could only emanate from other members of the UN.

CC:

Miss Stoddart, WIAD

Mr Nason, PTD Mr Fullerton, SED

Mr Sindall, SAmD

Mr Joy, M&CD

Mr Rosling, EAD

(for information)

Mr Posnett

Mr Bone, Research Dept

Mr Barltrop, CCD

Planning Staff

24 October 1978

Bolin A. Menn.

CA Munro Defence Department

CONFIDENTIAL

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.