THIS IS A COPY THE ORIGINAL HAS BEEN CLOSED UNTIL
UNDER FOI
EXEMPTION No 2.7..(w)(c) (d).
CONFIDENTIAL
4
d) Those claimed by other powers. UK Government se king to negotiate settlements consistent with the wishes of
e)
the inhabitants;
Hong Kong is not listed, as decolonisation is not an option.
i) Gibraltar
ii) Falkland Islands
and Dependencies
iii) Belize
The only practicable decolonisation option is some form of association with Spain
Independence not an option.
Independence probable if they accept terms of a settlement with Guatemala.
Those reluctant to become independent but may respond
to encouragement:
i) Bermuda..
However
Financially independent, so that a financial settlement would not in itself provide necessary impetus. offer of assistance by British Missions as channel of
communication for the Bermudian Government and help with consular services for a period of, say, 5 years might help to overcome Bermudian reluctance. Though not keen on becoming Independent Bermuda exercises much devolved power. The recent Green Paper on
Rather
Independence has not generated much enthusiasm. than allow things to develop slowly, should we not now say to the Bermuda Government that if they wish to retain their powers (and the death penalty) they must make speedy progress towards full Independence?
ii) British Virgin Islands
New constitution providing a greater degree of internal responsibility introduced in 1977. Islanders cautious regarding independence following 1971 recession which seriously affected their main industry-tourism.
Should we withdraw from budgetary aid? Should BVI link
with USVI? Would more substantial
Ald encourage BVI to seek independence (but probably not before 1980/81)?
iii) Cayman Islands
Financially independent. UN Mission to Caymans in May 1977 recognised islanders' determination to remain a Dependent Territory. Promise of consular help and economic aid may encourage independence.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.