19.
CONFIDENTIAL **
8
We considered with particular care the grading of posts within
the Judicial/Legal Group and have come to the following conclusions:
(a)
the salary differential between the ranks of District
Judge and Justice of Appeal/Judge of the High Court is
too wide;
(b)
there has been a significant increase in the responsibilities
20.
(c)
of the posts in the Principal Crown Counsel rank; and that
internal relativities and the facility to make sideways
transfer at the DJL 4 level aro of importance.
We therefore recommend that all ranks (District Judge,
President Lands Tribunal, Principal Crown Counsel, Assistent Registrar General) at the DJL 3 level be upgraded to the next point on the
Directorate scale (i.c. they should equate with D5, instead of D4).
21.
A list of recommended Judicial/Legal Group gradings with
effect from 1st April 1977 is at Appendix 5.
(e) Other posts
22.
In the course of our review we considered the relativities of
all ranks in the Directorate but we looked with particular care at the
posts of Chief Staff Officer Civil Aid Services, Secretary University &
Polytechnic Grants Committee, Commissioner London Office,and Commissioner
of Banking, as in each case it had been submitted to us that the grading
should be altered. We recommend no change in the grading of these ranks.
/23.
CONFIDENTIAL ##
機密
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.