34
A.
Yes.
141
Q.
A.
142
ن
is.
Q
h.
Fol
104
85.
So Uncle Luk knows him better than you do?
No doubt if you see this man again you will recognize him?
Yes.
On these 3 or 4 occasions you saw him was he in plainclothes
or uniform?
In plainclothes.
Do you know where he was stationed?
I don't know.
In your evidence in chief you said: "I have seen him
Moment
occasionally I cannot recognize him." A month ago you said you could identify him. How could you reconcile
this?'
I never told Court I could not recognize him.
2.
In other words you would fail to recognize him?
A.
Q.
Q.
f.
I never said I could not recognize him. I only said I dared not tell the Court his name.
Was it a lie to protect yourself. "I can't quite recognize him"
so that you would not be asked about him?
I have never said that I could not recognize him.
said I dared not reveal his name.
You are quite clear you can recognize him?
Yes. If I see him I can identify him.
I only
Have you any suggestions to offer why His Honour should write
"I don't quite recognize him"?
I never said "I could not quite recognize him".
So we are all just inventing this sentence?
When he came to look for Uncle Luk he came to look for Uncle
Luk.
I did not know him quite well.
You may not know Chan Sir well but you can recognize him
from photo
G
we are asking you if you can recognize Chan Sir? I can recognize him.
Qo
A.
Did you ever talk to him?
Sometimes I did. When he arrived there, I spoke to him one
or 2 sentences.
Q.
What sort of sentence?
A.
By greeting him and calling him "Mr. Chan" and nothing else.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.