405.
delivered -every difference in the world.
Court adjourned 10 minutes.
(ad.) 4. Garcia
District Judge
12.12.75.
408 428
682
683
Court resumes at 11.47.
hr. Gunston:
Another point: is that Crown has not produced a shred of evidence to show a single overt act. to show that accused did anything.
tions
Submit this
is strong indication that they aid not do any thing thele alleged conversa- between Lau Cheong wa and Defendants never in fact took place. Sceats clearly said although Temple received a large sum of money it was not sugested he did not carry out his duties. He did, and therefore Temple was not guilty of any conspiracy. R. v. Thompson 50 CAR 1956, 1. (headcote). No evidence in this case to show either Defondant had any such intention. Only evidence of agreement ic Lau's What weight should be attached to that? He is not only an accomplice a very tainted witness. Godber v. Queen 181/75. Page 14 If studerd applied to Lau he comes out very badly on all counts. (Criteria at pago 14). R. v. Turner I would strongly urge Your Honour not to attach any weight or reliance on the evidence of Lau Cheong wa. fe was asked at one time why from 1963 to 1971 had he found it not necessary to pay or bribe senior officers and his answer was unless someone whom had asked me, otherwise not necessary. He never for one moment suggested 1et and 2nd Defendants asked for it. He just marched in and started talking. Once again it becomes so unbelievable interviews he fixed upon 1st and 2nd defendants.
Police deneral Orders apparent from these and evidence of Blackburn all senior officers in Division one who is least responsible for carrying out raids would be ADS. set of general order: in June when 2D went to Bay View were quite different from hose after he had been there 6 weeks. Difference is not material. para.6. part.2 is police orders.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.