TNAG-0683-FCO40-832-Political-aspects-of-administration-of-justice-in-Hong-Kong-1977 — Page 319

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

305.

328

صرة جري

A.

A.

2.

In fact I did not assault then.

If you had not assaulted them, why should you be afraid of being murdered?

They had spent a lot of money in summonsing me. They failed in the case and in fact one of the prison officers was caught for perjury. When you said they sued, did they sue: you in Civil Court or summons you in Magistrate's Court?

in magistrate's Court.

Is that the only time you had been summonsed for assault in

Magistrate's Court?

A.

10.

Who was the

agistrate in that case?

Next m

á.

A.

A.

ར ན

A.

I can't remember. A Luropean.

How many times you had been prosecuted for assault in Court? Ivice,

You have also been on private police charge with another police officer on assault?

Ies.

In fact you have a pretty hot temper?

moderate.

Did you not nearly come to blows with Ma Hak Shing in Bay View? ΤΟ uch thing.

Did you have a terrific quarrel in Bay View with a Hak Shing? No.

Did you not threaten to complain again t him?

A.

2.

493

A.

10.

lie was my superior officer.

A.

مایید

2.

A.

ང་

Le fijured in the 3 tapes?

Zes.

Because he was sufficiently important in your eyes or because

you

hated

him?

Because it was important.

Lore important than 20?

You can say so.

Would you say so?

A.

les.

You think station sergeant is more important than bupt.?

A.

Under what circumstances?

Under circumstances you were in when you were making the tapes?

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.