TNAG-0683-FCO40-832-Political-aspects-of-administration-of-justice-in-Hong-Kong-1977 — Page 254

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

397

A.

+

3.

فريم

262

262

239.

Was it alleged Tai Bee took part in paying the money?

10. He was not connected with this.

Why was it necessary for you to call him before ir. McNiven

to deny something which he did not know?

Possibly to prove I did not pay any money.

How could he prove it?

He could prove.

How?

At that time Leung ang said he was present.

hen was he present?

I don't know. You read the file yourself.

Present at what time

inoney?

HOME

during time of alleged payment of

I don't know. I did not complain. He complained against

ile.

hy was Tai Bee called?

110

You have to ask lir. Mclliven.

i

A.

914

You say that Mr. McNiven called Tai Bee?

Yes.

I assisted him in finding Tai Bee.

And you are suggesting complaint against police, against you, investigation was conducted in such a proper manner that you arranged for attendance of witnesses?

It as a special case. Under special circumstances because

he could not find him.

Is it correct that some days before arrest of this man you had a meeting with him in the Harbour Hotel in the presence

of Tai Bee?

No.

At which a policeman called Fai Chai Yip was also present? No.

And is it correct that you induced Leung Wang to make a statement saying you would prepare a statement and he would get only a few months for fighting and you would pay his mother 10,000 as compensation and that Kwok Chi Koung would not be prosecuted?

No such thing. I don't know what you are talking about.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.