172
Q•
A.
Q.
A.
173
Q.
105.
When incident had occurred he would only go there and make collection in the evening. Usually he went at about 8 p.m.
sometimes he went once every 2 days.
You are not answering the question? Is it very difficult?
No.
.
Will you answer that question?
Tai Kau Lau returned and reported that the proprietor of
particular stall saying stall had been closed for several
hours and if decision was not to grant reduction and when
Tai Kau Lau went to stall he would refuse to accept reduced
amount.
And Tai Kau Lau would report application for reduction to
Ma Hak Shing?
A.
He reported to me and I reported to Ma Hak Shing.
Qe
What about Hung Chai?
4.
Qo
Q.
i.
Q.
& A & A &
A.
A &
A.
Qo
4.
He worked in a similar capacity as Tai Kau Lau.
Do you mean that Hung Chai would also report application for
reduction to you?
Yes.
And again decision would be conveyed to proprietor by Hung
Chai?
Correct.
Did you ever accompany Hung Chai as you did Tai Kau Lau?
No.
Were there any other collectors?
No.
Just Tai Kau Lau and Hung Chai.
And they both passed on requests for reduction to you?
Yes.
Who collected in Causeway Bay and who in Shaukiwan?
Tai Kau Lau collected from Causeway Bay and Hung Chai from
Shaukiwan.
You said there were no requests for reduction from Causeway
Bay?
That's right.
That's true?
A.
Yes.
124
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.